So, I watched the Presidential debate and was struck by a concept I didn't understand 4 years ago and I still don't now: that is to watch which way the 'political wind' is blowing (aka waffling) is bad.
Maybe I'm just missing something.
To me it seems having political leaders who look to the American public to see what they are wanting and moving toward would reflect a desire to do the will of the people. However, I get the impression this is seen as weak and pandering. Is this because it shows strength to be unmovable in ones resolve? Is it still strength when the majority of your constituents disagree with your viewpoint?
Now, I'm not saying that I think Kerry or Obama have a history of waffling... I'm just saying I don't understand why if they changed their mind on something, that would be a bad thing.
Maybe you can help me understand?
0 comments:
Post a Comment